Supreme Court: Police May Freeze Bank Accounts under S.102 CrPC in Prevention of Corruption Cases  ||  SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends on Time Expiry; Substituted Arbitrator Must Continue After Extension  ||  SC: Woman May Move Her Department’s ICC For Harassment by Employee of Another Workplace  ||  SC: Women’s Representation Requirement Applies to All Bar Associations in Gujarat  ||  SC: Contempt Power isn’t Judges’ Personal Shield nor a Tool to Silence Legitimate Criticism  ||  SC: Statutory Corporation Can Deduct under S.36(1)(viii) Only for Income from Long-Term Finance  ||  NCLT Kolkata: Costs for Compromise or Arrangement Scheme not Part of Liquidation Expenses  ||  NCLT Ahmedabad: Complaints Against Auditors or Company Secretaries Not Grounds for Company Probe  ||  SC: NCLT Can Forfeit Entire Deposit if Purchaser Defaults on Payment for Liquidation Assets  ||  Meghalaya HC: Non-Signatory or Non-Existent LLP Cannot Claim Arbitration via Group of Companies    

Madras High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking 100% Occupancy in Cinema Theatres - (09 Nov 2021)

CIVIL

Madras High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation petition which challenged the State government’s recent nod for 100% occupancy in cinema halls despite the threat of COVID-19 not having subsided completely. The Court, however, requested the government to review the situation depending upon the number of COVID-19 positive cases detected in individual cities, towns and other localities.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   100% OCCUPANCY IN CINEMA THEATRES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved