Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists  ||  Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness  ||  Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment  ||  Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met  ||  Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC  ||  Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable  ||  SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved    

Punjab and Haryana HC: Specifying Rights of Accused under NDPS Act Mandatory Requirement - (08 Nov 2021)

NARCOTICS

Punjab and Haryana High Court has observed that a notice under Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 should specify what rights the accused has under the NDPS Act. Merely informing the accused that he had rights under the NDPS Act, without specifying what rights the accused had under the NDPS Act, would not constitute compliance with the mandatory requirement.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   RIGHTS OF ACCUSED UNDER NDPS ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved