Supreme Court: Driving Licence Renewal After a Gap Will Not Take Effect From Expiry Date  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Quash Cheque Bounce Cases by Pre-Trial Inquiry Into Liability  ||  Supreme Court: Passport Renewal Cannot be Denied if Trial Court Has Permitted it Despite Pending Case  ||  SC: Delay in Depositing Sale Balance Does not Make Specific Performance Decree Inexecutable  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Compete Fees Qualify as Deductible Revenue Expenditure under Income Tax Act  ||  Supreme Court: Section 311 CrPC Should be Invoked Sparingly, Only When Evidence is Vital  ||  J&K&L High Court: Successive Bail Applications Can Be Filed Even Without Change in Circumstances  ||  Kerala HC: Fresh Arbitration Notice is Required For Second Arbitration After Prior Award Set Aside  ||  NCLT Hyderabad: Mortgaging Property Without Lending Money Does Not Constitute Financial Debt  ||  Supreme Court: Vacancies From Resignations under CUSAT Act Must Follow Communal Rotation    

Punjab and Haryana HC: Specifying Rights of Accused under NDPS Act Mandatory Requirement - (08 Nov 2021)

NARCOTICS

Punjab and Haryana High Court has observed that a notice under Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 should specify what rights the accused has under the NDPS Act. Merely informing the accused that he had rights under the NDPS Act, without specifying what rights the accused had under the NDPS Act, would not constitute compliance with the mandatory requirement.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   RIGHTS OF ACCUSED UNDER NDPS ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved