SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved  ||  Calcutta HC: Conviction under Essential Commodities Act Invalid if Stock Measured With a 'Stick'  ||  Kerala High Court: Universities Must Regulate Student Political Activities to Curb Campus Violence  ||  Calcutta HC: Accused Has No Right on Investigation Mode or Impleadment in Probe Writ  ||  Gauhati HC: POCSO Probes Must be Child-Friendly, With Sensitized Investigators to Ensure Clear Truth  ||  Kerala HC: Orders Barring Disclosure of Witness Statements Must State Reasons For Each Witness  ||  SC: Hard to Believe Married Woman Was Lured Into Sex by False Marriage Promise; Case Quashed    

Singapore Arbitration Panel: Future Retail Must Take Part in Arbitration Over Dispute with Amazon - (22 Oct 2021)

ARBITRATION

Singapore Arbitration Panel has ruled that Future Retail must take part in arbitration over a commercial dispute with Amazon.com Inc, rejecting the Indian retailer's bid to avoid the process. The Panel has said that the three agreements at the heart of the Future-Amazon dispute must be read together, and not separately and the tribunal has jurisdiction over FRL (Future Retail) in this Arbitration.

Tags : SINGAPORE ARBITRATION PANEL   FUTURE RETAIL   AMAZON  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved