Allahabad HC: Pension Can’t Be Withheld For Incident That Occurred Four Years Prior to Retirement  ||  Cal. HC: Jurisdiction Can’t Be Assumed By Consumer Forum When Arbitration Prescribed By Special Law  ||  Calcutta High Court: Court Not Merely Obligated to Appoint Arbitrator u/s 11(6) of A&C Act  ||  Supreme Court: Suit of Injunction Not Maintainable if Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title Over Property  ||  SC: Deemed Income of Homemaker Can’t Be Less Than Daily Wages Prescribed Under Minimum Wages Act  ||  Ori HC: Can’t Recover Excess Payment Made to Emp. From Leave Encashment Benefits Post Retirement  ||  Delhi High Court: Can’t Use Senior Citizens Act For Purposes of Property Dispute  ||  Central Government Modifies Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022  ||  Delhi High Stays Judgement Related to Investigation Under PMLA  ||  SC: Circumstantial Evidence Has to Be Supported With Other Evidence in Order to Make it Strong    

Bombay HC Rejects UltraTech Cement's Plan to Buy JP Associates’ Cement Plants in MP - (29 Feb 2016)

Bombay High Court has rejected the scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of two cement plants of JP Associates by UltraTech Cement, citing the new MMDR Act as the prime reason.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT  ULTRATECH CEMENT   JP ASSOCIATES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved