Supreme Court: Appellate Courts Have Limited Power to Modify Arbitral Awards  ||  Supreme Court: ‘Digital Access’ a Part of Fundamental Right to Life  ||  NCLAT: Adjudica. Authority Can’t Ignore Sufficient Material to Show Dispute u/s 9(5)(ii)(d) of IBC  ||  Bombay HC: Order of Granting or Refusing Temporary Injunction is 'Discretionary'  ||  Bom HC: Can’t Treat Disclosure as Full if Material Suggests Loan is Nothing but Undisclosed Fund  ||  Delhi HC: Uploading SCN Under ‘Additional Notices’ Tab Not Proper  ||  Kar. HC: Central Government to Take Steps for Blocking 'Proton Mail' in India  ||  SC: CBI to Conduct Preliminary Enquiries in ‘Builder-Banks’ Nexus  ||  SC: Presiding Officers of Commercial Courts Should be Imparted Some Training  ||  SC: It is Constitutional to Fix Pecuniary Jurisdiction Based on Value of Consideration    

Gauhati HC: Section 29 and 30 POCSO Act Doesn’t Relieve Prosecution of Burden to Prove Case - (15 Sep 2021)

CRIMINAL

Gauhati High Court has observed that Section 29 & 30 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 doesn't actually relieve the prosecution of its burden to prove a case; however, these provisions only lessen the prosecution's burden by shifting the onus of proof to the accused.

Tags : GAUHATI HIGH COURT   SECTION 29 AND 30 POCSO ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved