Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Nikhil Soni v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Rajasthan) (10 Aug 2015)

Practice of 'Santhara' to be treated as suicide punishable under section 309 of the Indian Penal Code

MANU/RH/1345/2015

Constitution

The Rajasthan High Court held the practice of Santhara (Sallekhana), fasting unto death to attain 'moksha', impermissible under Article 21 of the Constitution (protection of life) and it could not be included as an essential religious practice under Article 25 of the Constitution. The Court was unable to conclude from scriptures, preachings, articles or practices followed by the Jain ascetics that Santhara was to be treated as an essential religious practice in the Jain religion. Determining that the practice was not necessary for the pursuit of immortality or 'moksha', and in upholding the principles of public order, health and morality, the Court issued directions to the State to stop commission of Santhara (Sallekhana). The practice is to be treated as suicide punishable under Section 309 IPC; its abetment is punishable under Section 306 of the IPC.

Relevant : Article 25 Constitution of India Act Gian Kaur Vs. State of Punjab MANU/SC/0335/1996 P. Rathinam/Nagbhusham Patnaik Vs. Union of India MANU/SC/0433/1994 Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANU/SC/0176/2011

Tags : SANTHARA   RELIGIOUS FREEDOM   SUICIDE   PROHIBIT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved