NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Nikhil Soni v. Union of India and Ors. - (High Court of Rajasthan) (10 Aug 2015)

Practice of 'Santhara' to be treated as suicide punishable under section 309 of the Indian Penal Code

MANU/RH/1345/2015

Constitution

The Rajasthan High Court held the practice of Santhara (Sallekhana), fasting unto death to attain 'moksha', impermissible under Article 21 of the Constitution (protection of life) and it could not be included as an essential religious practice under Article 25 of the Constitution. The Court was unable to conclude from scriptures, preachings, articles or practices followed by the Jain ascetics that Santhara was to be treated as an essential religious practice in the Jain religion. Determining that the practice was not necessary for the pursuit of immortality or 'moksha', and in upholding the principles of public order, health and morality, the Court issued directions to the State to stop commission of Santhara (Sallekhana). The practice is to be treated as suicide punishable under Section 309 IPC; its abetment is punishable under Section 306 of the IPC.

Relevant : Article 25 Constitution of India Act Gian Kaur Vs. State of Punjab MANU/SC/0335/1996 P. Rathinam/Nagbhusham Patnaik Vs. Union of India MANU/SC/0433/1994 Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANU/SC/0176/2011

Tags : SANTHARA   RELIGIOUS FREEDOM   SUICIDE   PROHIBIT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved