SC: In Rape Cases, Testimony of Prosecutrix Alone may be Sufficient to Find Guilt  ||  SC: Sessions Court has Authority to Summon Additional Accused at Committal Stage  ||  SC Strikes Down Notification Exempting Projects Like Schools from Obtaining Environmental Clearence  ||  SC: FIR of Confessional Nature Made by an Accused is Inadmissible in Evidence  ||  SC: Alimony from First Marriage Irrelevant to Decide Alimony from Second Marriage  ||  CJI: No Designated Senior Advocate to Orally Mention Matters  ||  SC Seeks Response from ECI regarding Deletion of 65 Lakh Voters  ||  SC: IBC Moratorium doesn’t Prevent Voluntary Return of Property When Keeping it is Unviable  ||  SC: Can Infer Creation of Trust from Circumstances when No Formal Recognition Given to Society  ||  Delhi High Court Passes Summary Judgment in Favour of Tata Power in Trademark Infringement Suit    

Allahabad HC: Power u/s 391 CrPC Same as Power Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC - (31 Aug 2021)

CIVIL

Allahabad High Court has observed that power under Section of 391 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is akin to those of Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, holding that such powers to take additional evidence by the appellate Court must be exercised sparingly.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   POWER TO TAKE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved