Supreme Court: Wait-Listed Candidates Have No Vested Right After List Expiry  ||  SC: Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must be Considered For Open Posts  ||  SC: AICTE Regulations Do Not Govern Direct Recruitment of Engineering Professors by State PSCs  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts To Decide Article 226(3) Applications Within Two Weeks  ||  SC: State Agencies are Competent To Probe Corruption Cases Against Central Government Officers  ||  Allahabad High Court: Wife May Claim Education Expenses; Adverse Inference If Husband Hides Income  ||  Patna High Court: Cruelty Claims Against In-Laws are Unlikely Without Shared Residence or Interaction  ||  Patna HC: Aadhaar and GPS-Based Attendance For Medical College Faculty Does Not Violate Privacy  ||  Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report  ||  MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC    

Allahabad HC: No Requirement for Director of Laboratory to Prove Report from State Laboratory - (20 Aug 2021)

CRIMINAL

Allahabad High Court has held that since a report of State Forensic Science Laboratory is admissible in evidence as per the provision of Section 293 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 therefore, there is no requirement to call the Director of that laboratory to get the same proved.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   REPORT FROM STATE LABORATORY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved