Supreme Court: Long-Standing Religious Rituals Must Not be Changed for Administrative Convenience  ||  Supreme Court: Tendering Authority Cannot Impose Conditions That Contradict the Tender Notice  ||  SC: In-House Counsel aren’t 'Advocates'; Their Employer Communications Lack S.132 BSA Protection  ||  NCLAT: Unenforced Equitable Mortgage is Corporate Debtor’s Asset, Not to Be Treated as Margin Money  ||  NCLT Approves Hindustan Unilever’s Ice Cream Business Demerger into Kwality Wall’s  ||  Supreme Court: Bar Councils Cannot Charge Over Rs 750 for Enrollment or Withhold Applicants’ Docs  ||  SC Cancels POCSO Conviction, Observing Crime Resulted from Love, Not Lust, After Marriage  ||  Supreme Court: Advocates Can be Summoned Only under S.132 BSA Exceptions with Prior Officer Approval  ||  Allahabad HC: Juvenile Conviction Cannot be Treated as Disqualification for Government Jobs  ||  Delhi HC: DV Act Rights of Daughter-in-Law Cannot Deny In-Laws’ Right to Reside in Home    

P&H High Court: No Preference in Jobs for TET-2011 Candidates - (22 Feb 2016)

Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that candidates for master cadre cannot seek preference on ground that they passed Punjab State Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) some five years ago.

Tags : PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT   PUNJAB STATE TEACHERS ELIGIBILITY TEST  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved