NCLAT: Can Seek Eviction of Tenant from Corporate Debtor's Property under Tenancy Law  ||  NCLAT: For Calculating Limitation Period, Period from 15.3.2020 to 28.2.2022 shall stand excluded  ||  NCLAT: Adjudicating Authority Can’t Decide Workers' Claims for Layoff Period Dues under ID Act  ||  NCLAT: While Dismissing Appeal for Non-Prosecu., Adj. Authority Can’t Direct Dismissal on Merits Too  ||  NCLAT: Claims Subsequent to Cut-off Date to be Dealt as Per RP by Adjudicating Authority  ||  NCLAT Upholds Canara Bank’s Claims for Loans Advanced to CD on behalf of Homebuyers  ||  Allahabad HC Stays Criminal Proceedings on Ground of Inordinate Delay Caused by State  ||  Ker. HC Declares Rule 12(9) of the Kerala Paddy Land and Wetland Rules as Ultra Vires  ||  Del. HC: Support to Terrorist Organisation through Money or Networking is Prohibited under UAPA  ||  HP HC: Mentioning of Wong Provision Not Fatal to Application    

Allahabad HC: Proviso on Recording of Sexual Offence Victim’s Statement Not Being Followed - (16 Aug 2021)

CRIMINAL

Allahabad High Court has observed that in majority of cases, 1st and 2nd proviso to Section 161 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which mandate the recording of sexual offences victim's statement by audio-video means and by a women officer, are not being followed by the Investigating Officers in the true sense.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   PROVISO ON RECORDING OF SEXUAL OFFENCE VICTIM’S STATEMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved