J&K&L HC: Undenied Pleadings are Deemed Admitted by Implication under the CPC  ||  Kerala HC: Transfer Order Pending Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot be Disguised as Punishment  ||  Allahabad HC: GST, Incentives, 0r Festival Advances Cannot be Deducted From Employee’s Retiral Dues  ||  SC: Absconding Accused Cannot Claim Anticipatory Bail Solely Because a Co-Accused Was Acquitted  ||  Supreme Court: District Cricket Bodies Must Adopt Good Governance Voluntarily, Not Follow BCCI Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Post-Award Property Purchasers Cannot Resist Execution of an Arbitral Award  ||  SC: Telecom Spectrum is a Community Resource and its Ownership Cannot be Decided under the IBC  ||  SC: Police Failure to Invoke IPC Provisions Led to Contractor’s Acquittal in Cement Stockpiling Case  ||  SC: Bank’s Internal Classification of Debt as NPA Does Not Determine Limitation under the IBC  ||  Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees    

Karnataka HC: Any Unreasoned Delay to Consider Appointment Would Make Authority Personally Liable - (20 Jul 2021)

CIVIL

Karnataka High Court has held that any unreasoned or unjustifiable delay on the part of the Authority to consider an application for appointment on compassionate grounds would make such an Authority personally responsible to pay damages by way of wages to that applicant which he would be entitled to, if an appointment had been granted.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   ANY UNREASONED DELAY TO CONSIDER APPOINTMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved