Del HC: Evidence in Predicate Offence by Accused Who Becomes Approver Can’t be Used in PMLA Procee.  ||  Del. HC: Order Passed in Favour of Indian Hotels Company Over Use of ‘Ginger’ Trademark  ||  Supreme Court: Notice Issued to IBBI Over Ambiguity in Uploading NCLT Orders  ||  SC: It is Up to the Arbitral Tribunal to Adjudicate Upon Construction of Terms of Contract  ||  Supreme Court: Replication to WS Can be Filed by Election Petitioner if New Facts Not Introduced  ||  Del. HC: Convict Can’t Seek Parole for Maint. Conjugal Relat. With Live-in Partner When Wife Present  ||  Delhi High Court: Parties Must Not Ordinarily Resort to Transfer of Case to Another Court  ||  Status Quo Ordered by SC on Felling of Trees in Ridge/Reserve Forest, Contempt Notice Issued  ||  SC: Presiding Officers/Members of JJ Board Should Specifically Mention Names in Orders  ||  Open Air Prisons Suggested by Supreme Court as Solution to Overcrowding of Prisons    

Bombay HC Declines Lawyers’ Plea to be Considered as Essential Staff to Enable Use of Local Trains - (14 Jul 2021)

CIVIL

Bombay High Court has said it could not go beyond medical advice and declare lawyers as essential staff to enable them to use local trains to travel to work during the COVID-19 pandemic, in a couple of public interest litigation petitions seeking inclusion of lawyers in the list of essential staff and to permit them to travel by the special suburban/local trains being run during the pandemic.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   LAWYERS AS ESSENTIAL STAFF  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved