Allahabad HC: MPs, Judges and Ministers May Use ‘Hon’ble’; Civil Servants are Not Entitled to it  ||  Calcutta HC: Salary Withholding and Harassment Claims are Not Defamation Without Reputational Harm  ||  Gauhati HC: Officer Resigning Without New Govt Appointment Cannot Claim Pension under Assam Service  ||  MP HC: Attachment & Auction are Quasi-Judicial Duties of Tehsildar; Action Invalid Without Mala Fide  ||  Supreme Court: Fence-Sitters Cannot Raise Seniority Disputes Once Third-Party Rights are Settled  ||  SC: Medical Negligence Claims Can be Filed Against Deceased Doctor’s Legal Heirs Who Inherit Estate  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Must Be Considered if Speedy Trial Rights are Violated, Regardless of Offence  ||  Supreme Court: Article 226 Cannot be Used to Seek FIR Registration Without Exhausting Remedies  ||  SC: Dowry Deaths Remain a Grave Social Issue, Especially in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Karnataka  ||  Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227    

Bombay HC Upholds TRAI's Tariff Order Except One Condition in TV Channels' Challenge - (01 Jul 2021)

MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION

Bombay High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 11 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Act, 1997 regarding the regulator's powers and functions over television broadcasters. The Court also upheld TRAI's 2017 and 2020 Tariff Order (Rules) and regulations but has set aside the condition according to which the MRP of an a-la-carte channel could not be more than 1/3rd the maximum rate of a channel in the bouquet.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   TRAI'S TARIFF ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved