SC: Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Prelims Relaxation Cannot Claim an Unreserved Seat  ||  SC: Public Sector Enterprises Cannot Act Against Retired Employees Without Clear Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Single FIR is Permissible in Mass Cheating Cases Arising From One Conspiracy  ||  SC: Courts Cannot Take Cognizance of Time-Barred Cheque Bounce Cases Without Condoning Delay  ||  SC: Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Always Bar Criminal Prosecution  ||  SC: Judge Cannot Be Presumed Biased Merely Because a Litigant’s Relative Is Police or Court Staff  ||  Delhi HC: Delays From Medical Review Cannot Justify Ante-Dated Seniority For BSF Candidates  ||  Allahabad HC: Being ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Does Not Completely Bar Grant of Anticipatory Bail  ||  Delhi HC: Abortion by a Married Woman For Marital Discord is Legal under The MTP Act  ||  NCLT Kochi: Fraud Has No Time Limit and Directors Cannot Use Delay As a Defense    

Karnataka HC Directs State to Take Decision on Providing Video Conferencing Facilities - (25 Jun 2021)

CIVIL

Karnataka High Court has directed the State Government to take a decision on providing Video Conferencing facilities to all quasi judicial authorities in the state. The Court has said that the first and second wave of covid-19 has resulted in complete shutdown of quasi judicial bodies in the state and that all the authorities must be in a state of preparedness to deal with the situation which may be created by a possible third wave of Covid-19.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   PROVIDING VIDEO CONFERENCING FACILITIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved