Bombay High Court: ‘GIRNAR’ a Well Known Trademark in India || Kerala HC: Criminal Courts of District Judiciary Cannot Recall their Earlier Orders || Madras HC: Only ‘Preponderance of Probability’ Required in Disciplinary Proceedings || Raj HC: Non-Disclosure of Information Wasn’t a Ground for Disqualification Before 2015 Amendment Act || Bom. HC: Workers in Statutory Canteens are Principal Employer’s Employees || Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions || Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions || SC Refuses to Mark Presence of Advocate Who Did Not Argue the Matter || SC Sets Aside HC’s Decision to Accept Aadhaar Card as a Proof of Date of Birth || SC Permits Candidate with Blindness to Attend Interview for Selection of Civil Judges in Rajasthan

MP HC: right to Life Also Includes Right to Health; State to Provide Adequate Measures for Protection - (20 Apr 2021)

CONSTITUTION

Madhya Pradesh High Court has referred to various Supreme Court judgments which have interpreted Article 21 of the Constitution of India, 1949 so as to expand the meaning of the right to life to also include the right to health, stating that the right to health can be secured to the citizens only if the State provides adequate measures for their treatment, healthcare and takes their care by protecting them from calamities like Coronavirus.

Tags : MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT ADEQUATE MEASURES FOR PROTECTION FROM CORONAVIRUS

Share :