Supreme Court: Compassionate Appointees Cannot Later Claim Entitlement to a Higher Post  ||  NCLAT New Delhi: Insolvency Pleas Cannot Be Admitted When Information Utility Records Show a Dispute  ||  NCLAT: Issuing Cheques For Another Entity’s Liabilities Does not Constitute Operational Debt  ||  NCLAT: SEBI Penalties Imposed After Liquidation Begins are Not Admissible as Claims  ||  NCLT Reiterates That an Auction Purchaser is Not Liable For a Corporate Debtor’s Electricity Dues  ||  Delhi HC Upholds Interim Injunction Against 'Power Flex' in Bata’s Trademark Infringement Case  ||  Calcutta High Court: Mere Presence of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Cannot Bar Compensation to Heirs  ||  Kerala High Court: Review Petition Cannot Be Entertained Against an Order Refusing Arbitration  ||  J&K High Court: Umadevi Judgment Does not Justify Perpetual Temporary Employment  ||  SC: Public Premises Act Prevails over State Rent Laws For Evicting Unauthorised Occupants    

Gujarat HC Notes Divergence Between Numbers of People Tested and People Infected by Covid-19 - (16 Apr 2021)

CIVIL

Gujarat High Court has observed that had the Gujarat Government taken pre-emptive steps earlier, the present grim situation of COVID-19 pandemic could have been avoided, noting that there seemed to be a divergence between the numbers of those tested, as provided by the state, and the actual numbers of those infected.

Tags : GUJARAT HIGH COURT   DIFFERENCE IN NUMBERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved