Supreme Court: Issues of Party Capacity and Maintainability Must Be Decided by Arbitral Tribunal  ||  Supreme Court: Omissions in Chief Examination Can Be Rectified During Cross-Examination  ||  Supreme Court: Items Given by Accused to Police Are Not Section 27 Recoveries under Evidence Act  ||  Gujarat High Court: Waqf Institutions Must Pay Court Fees When Filing Disputes in State Tribunal  ||  Allahabad High Court: Law Treats All Equally, State Cannot Gain Undue Benefit from Delay Condonation  ||  SC: SARFAESI Act Was Not Applicable in Nagaland Before its 2021 Adoption, Dismisses Creditor’s Plea  ||  SC: Lis Pendens Applies To Money Suits on Mortgaged Property, Including Ex Parte Proceedings  ||  Kerala HC: Civil Courts Cannot Grant Injunctions in NCLT Matters and Such Orders Can Be Set Aside  ||  Bombay High Court: Technical Breaks to Temporary Employees Cannot Deny Maternity Leave Benefits  ||  NCLAT: Appellate Jurisdiction Limited to Orders Deciding Parties’ Rights, Not Procedural Directions    

Patna HC: Judicial Officers Cannot Stake Experience of Advocate for Recruitment as District Judge - (12 Apr 2021)

SERVICE

Patna High Court has held that judicial officers, who opted to be appointed in subordinate judicial services cannot stake claim of "past experience" of being an advocate for being promoted to direct recruitment from the Bar as a District Judge (Entry Level). The Court has observed that a candidate sitting for direct recruitment examination from the Bar has to remain an advocate with 7 years of experience not only at the time of cut off date but also at the stage of his appointment.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   RECRUITMENT AS DISTRICT JUDGE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved