SC: Minority Status of AMU Not Lost Merely Because of its Incorporation by Statute  ||  Ker. HC: Media Expressing Definitive Opinion Regarding Guilt/Innocence of Party Not Protected u/a 19  ||  Madras HC: No Law Which Fixes Number of Persons Who Can Appear for/Accompany a Party to Court  ||  Bench Strength of J&K and Ladakh High Court Increased from 17 to 25  ||  HP HC: No Application of Section 29A of A&C Act on Proceedings Commencing before 2015 Amendment Act  ||  HP HC: Parties Must Object to Tribunal’s Jurisdi. u/s 16 of A&C Act Before/During Defence Statement  ||  SC: Officers of DRI are ‘Proper Officers’ for Purpose of Section 28 of Customs Act  ||  Supreme Court: NCRB Authorised to Collect Data of Prisoners  ||  Supreme Court Amends Supreme Court Rules, 2013  ||  SC: Candidate in Select List Doesn’t Have Indefeasible Right to Be Appointed    

SC: HC Should Be Extremely Circumspect in Interfering With Orders Passed Under Arbitration Act - (09 Apr 2021)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has reiterated that a High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1949 should be extremely circumspect in interfering with orders passed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INTERFERING WITH ORDERS PASSED UNDER ARBITRATION ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved