SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved  ||  Calcutta HC: Conviction under Essential Commodities Act Invalid if Stock Measured With a 'Stick'  ||  Kerala High Court: Universities Must Regulate Student Political Activities to Curb Campus Violence  ||  Calcutta HC: Accused Has No Right on Investigation Mode or Impleadment in Probe Writ  ||  Gauhati HC: POCSO Probes Must be Child-Friendly, With Sensitized Investigators to Ensure Clear Truth  ||  Kerala HC: Orders Barring Disclosure of Witness Statements Must State Reasons For Each Witness  ||  SC: Hard to Believe Married Woman Was Lured Into Sex by False Marriage Promise; Case Quashed    

SC: HC Should Be Extremely Circumspect in Interfering With Orders Passed Under Arbitration Act - (09 Apr 2021)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has reiterated that a High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1949 should be extremely circumspect in interfering with orders passed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INTERFERING WITH ORDERS PASSED UNDER ARBITRATION ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved