SC: Dismissal, Being the Severest Punishment, Should be Imposed Only For Grave Misconduct  ||  SC: Constructive Res Judicata Applies to Grounds Omitted Through Negligence or Inadvertence  ||  Madras High Court: Honour Killing is a Shameful Act and an Extreme Manifestation of Casteism  ||  Bombay High Court: Traditional Families Often Hesitate to Report Sexual Offences  ||  Jharkhand High Court Directs Circle Officers to Digitally Verify Land Records and Remove Mismatches  ||  MP High Court: Writ Court Cannot Grant Interim Relief Once Party is Relegated to Alternate Forum  ||  Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations    

Attorney General Refuses Consent to Initiate Contempt Proceedings Against Rahul Gandhi - (24 Mar 2021)

CONTEMPT OF COURT

Attorney General for India, KK Venugopal has declined to grant consent to initiate criminal contempt of proceedings against Congress Member of Parliament, Rahul Gandhi for his statements against judiciary. The AG has observed that Gandhi's statements made a general reference to "judiciary" and contained no specific reference to the Supreme Court. He pointed out that under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the Attorney General has jurisdiction to grant consent for initiation of proc

Tags : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIA   RAHUL GANDHI  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved