SC: In Rape Cases, Testimony of Prosecutrix Alone may be Sufficient to Find Guilt  ||  SC: Sessions Court has Authority to Summon Additional Accused at Committal Stage  ||  SC Strikes Down Notification Exempting Projects Like Schools from Obtaining Environmental Clearence  ||  SC: FIR of Confessional Nature Made by an Accused is Inadmissible in Evidence  ||  SC: Alimony from First Marriage Irrelevant to Decide Alimony from Second Marriage  ||  CJI: No Designated Senior Advocate to Orally Mention Matters  ||  SC Seeks Response from ECI regarding Deletion of 65 Lakh Voters  ||  SC: IBC Moratorium doesn’t Prevent Voluntary Return of Property When Keeping it is Unviable  ||  SC: Can Infer Creation of Trust from Circumstances when No Formal Recognition Given to Society  ||  Delhi High Court Passes Summary Judgment in Favour of Tata Power in Trademark Infringement Suit    

Bombay HC: Telephonic/Email Communications No Substitute For In-Person Hearing - (18 Mar 2021)

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Bombay High Court has ruled that telephonic or email communications could not be a substitute for the right of a personal hearing in a Goods and Services Tax refund claim.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   GST REFUND CLAIM  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved