SC: Mere Mention of 'Arbitration' Does not Form Agreement Without Clear Intent  ||  SC: No Entitlement to Job as Compensation for Land Acquired under Land Acquisition Act  ||  SC: Court Cannot Probe Credibility of FIR Allegations While Entertaining Quashing Plea  ||  SC: Notice under Indian Forest Act Does not Transfer Private Forests to Maharashtra Law  ||  SC: Unilateral Termination of Sale Agreement Invalid if Contract Does Not Permit it  ||  NCLAT: Pre-COVID Defaults do not Exempt Debtors From Insolvency Proceedings  ||  NCLAT: Liquidator Must Obtain NCLT Approval Before Conducting Private Sale  ||  NCLAT: Contract Termination for Performance Default Not Barred by CIRP Moratorium  ||  Kerala HC: Partial Specific Performance Not Allowed if Defendant Holds Undisputed Property Title  ||  Kerala HC: Complainant Must be Informed if Probe Against FIR-Named Accused is Dropped    

District Consumer Redressal Forum, Bengaluru Directs Coaching Institute to Refund Fees - (16 Feb 2021)

CONSUMER

District Consumer Redressal Forum, Bengaluru has directed a coaching institute to refund the fee collected from a father whose daughter failed in the class 9 exams, holding the coaching institute liable for 'deficiency of service' under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Tags : DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM   COACHING INSTITUTE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved