Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof || SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required || Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt || Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment || Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution || Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty || Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act || J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry || Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act || NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another

Nabam Rebia v Registrar General, Gauhati High Court and ors. - (Supreme Court) (27 Jan 2016)

Arunachal Pradesh President’s Rule petition deferred

Constitution

The Supreme Court decided to hear petitions against President’s Rule in Arunachal Pradesh on 1 February, 2016. It called for adducing copies of the State Governor’s report recommending President’s Rule and other material that was in support of issuing the proclamation.

Relevant : President proclaims powers under Article 356 in Arunachal Pradesh MANU/HOME/0004/2016 Article 356 Constitution of India Act

Tags : PRESIDENT’S RULE ARUNACHAL PRADESH

Share :