Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Nabam Rebia v Registrar General, Gauhati High Court and ors. - (Supreme Court) (27 Jan 2016)

Arunachal Pradesh President’s Rule petition deferred

Constitution

The Supreme Court decided to hear petitions against President’s Rule in Arunachal Pradesh on 1 February, 2016. It called for adducing copies of the State Governor’s report recommending President’s Rule and other material that was in support of issuing the proclamation.

Relevant : President proclaims powers under Article 356 in Arunachal Pradesh MANU/HOME/0004/2016 Article 356 Constitution of India Act

Tags : PRESIDENT’S RULE   ARUNACHAL PRADESH  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved