NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings || Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint || Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same || Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted || Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers || SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority || SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays || SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab || SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal || SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches

Nabam Rebia v Registrar General, Gauhati High Court and ors. - (Supreme Court) (27 Jan 2016)

Arunachal Pradesh President’s Rule petition deferred

Constitution

The Supreme Court decided to hear petitions against President’s Rule in Arunachal Pradesh on 1 February, 2016. It called for adducing copies of the State Governor’s report recommending President’s Rule and other material that was in support of issuing the proclamation.

Relevant : President proclaims powers under Article 356 in Arunachal Pradesh MANU/HOME/0004/2016 Article 356 Constitution of India Act

Tags : PRESIDENT’S RULE ARUNACHAL PRADESH

Share :