SC: Insurer Must Pay Accident Compensation Despite Route Permit Violation, Recoverable From Owner  ||  SC: Recovery of Currency Alone Doesn’t Convict under PC Act Without Proof of Demand and Acceptance  ||  SC: Minor Variations in Later Statements Don’t Undermine First Dying Declaration if Reliable  ||  SC: Members of Unlawful Assembly Liable under Section 149 IPC Once Common Object is Proven  ||  Madras HC: Grandparents Can Execute Adoption Deed for Unmarried Daughter if She Consents  ||  Delhi HC: Guilty Plea Doesn’t Bypass Double Jeopardy; Second Conviction for Same Offence Invalid  ||  Del HC: Provision of Recall u/s 311 CrPC Ensures Justice, Not Multiple Chances to Negligent Litigant  ||  AP HC: Shutdown of Specific Unit Constitutes Closure, Workers Entitled to Compensation under S.25FFF  ||  P&H High Court: Over-Implication of Accused’s Relatives Turns Criminal Process Into Harassment  ||  Delhi HC: Denying Candidature of Physically Disabled Person Due to 'No Vacancy' Violates RPwD Act    

SC: Incorporation of One-Sided Clauses in Apartment Buyer’s Agreement is Unfair Trade Practice - (12 Jan 2021)

CONSUMER

Supreme Court has held that the incorporation of one-sided and unreasonable clauses in the Apartment Buyer's Agreement constitutes an unfair trade practice under Section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court has observed that the Developer cannot compel the apartment buyers to be bound by the one-sided contractual terms contained in the Apartment Buyer's Agreement.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ONE-SIDED CLAUSES IN APARTMENT BUYER’S AGREEMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved