NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App. || Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement || Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles || Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025" || Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark || Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity || Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks || HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity || Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void || Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it

S.M. Asif v. Virender Kumar Bajaj - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

'Judgment on admissions' not suitable when objections raised go to the root of the case

MANU/SC/0860/2015

Civil

In an appeal against an order of the trial court passed on the admission of a landlord-tenant relationship, the Supreme Court found the same inappropriate given the nature of dispute. It held that a "mere admission of relationship of landlord and tenant cannot be said to be an unequivocal admission" when the the defence pleaded an agreement to sell the property and payments made towards the sale.

Relevant : Order XII Rule 6 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Act

Tags : JUDGMENT ON ADMISSION INAPPROPRIATE UNSUITABLE

Share :