NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports || Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC || SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation || SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job || NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights || NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation || Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation || Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute' || Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices || Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear

S.M. Asif v. Virender Kumar Bajaj - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

'Judgment on admissions' not suitable when objections raised go to the root of the case

MANU/SC/0860/2015

Civil

In an appeal against an order of the trial court passed on the admission of a landlord-tenant relationship, the Supreme Court found the same inappropriate given the nature of dispute. It held that a "mere admission of relationship of landlord and tenant cannot be said to be an unequivocal admission" when the the defence pleaded an agreement to sell the property and payments made towards the sale.

Relevant : Order XII Rule 6 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Act

Tags : JUDGMENT ON ADMISSION INAPPROPRIATE UNSUITABLE

Share :