Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency || Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children || Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims || Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations || Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary || Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother || Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly || Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay || Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State || Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders

S.M. Asif v. Virender Kumar Bajaj - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

'Judgment on admissions' not suitable when objections raised go to the root of the case

MANU/SC/0860/2015

Civil

In an appeal against an order of the trial court passed on the admission of a landlord-tenant relationship, the Supreme Court found the same inappropriate given the nature of dispute. It held that a "mere admission of relationship of landlord and tenant cannot be said to be an unequivocal admission" when the the defence pleaded an agreement to sell the property and payments made towards the sale.

Relevant : Order XII Rule 6 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Act

Tags : JUDGMENT ON ADMISSION INAPPROPRIATE UNSUITABLE

Share :