SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation || Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case || Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights || Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims || Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation || Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity || Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper || Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration || Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal || Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status

S.M. Asif v. Virender Kumar Bajaj - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

'Judgment on admissions' not suitable when objections raised go to the root of the case

MANU/SC/0860/2015

Civil

In an appeal against an order of the trial court passed on the admission of a landlord-tenant relationship, the Supreme Court found the same inappropriate given the nature of dispute. It held that a "mere admission of relationship of landlord and tenant cannot be said to be an unequivocal admission" when the the defence pleaded an agreement to sell the property and payments made towards the sale.

Relevant : Order XII Rule 6 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Act

Tags : JUDGMENT ON ADMISSION INAPPROPRIATE UNSUITABLE

Share :