P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court || Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long || Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo || Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision || Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act || Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself || Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession || SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings || SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order || NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions

S.M. Asif v. Virender Kumar Bajaj - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

'Judgment on admissions' not suitable when objections raised go to the root of the case

MANU/SC/0860/2015

Civil

In an appeal against an order of the trial court passed on the admission of a landlord-tenant relationship, the Supreme Court found the same inappropriate given the nature of dispute. It held that a "mere admission of relationship of landlord and tenant cannot be said to be an unequivocal admission" when the the defence pleaded an agreement to sell the property and payments made towards the sale.

Relevant : Order XII Rule 6 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Act

Tags : JUDGMENT ON ADMISSION INAPPROPRIATE UNSUITABLE

Share :