Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

NCLAT Turns Down Reference Seeking Re-Consideration of Decision in V. Padamakumar Case - (23 Dec 2020)

COMPANY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has turned down a reference made by a three-member Bench, seeking re-consideration of the decision in V. Padamakumar v. Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund (SASF) & Anr. where it was held that entries in books of accounts will not amount to acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   V. PADAMAKUMAR V. STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND (SASF) & ANR.  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved