Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

NCLAT Turns Down Reference Seeking Re-Consideration of Decision in V. Padamakumar Case - (23 Dec 2020)

COMPANY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has turned down a reference made by a three-member Bench, seeking re-consideration of the decision in V. Padamakumar v. Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund (SASF) & Anr. where it was held that entries in books of accounts will not amount to acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   V. PADAMAKUMAR V. STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND (SASF) & ANR.  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved