Supreme Court: Wait-Listed Candidates Have No Vested Right After List Expiry  ||  SC: Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must be Considered For Open Posts  ||  SC: AICTE Regulations Do Not Govern Direct Recruitment of Engineering Professors by State PSCs  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts To Decide Article 226(3) Applications Within Two Weeks  ||  SC: State Agencies are Competent To Probe Corruption Cases Against Central Government Officers  ||  Allahabad High Court: Wife May Claim Education Expenses; Adverse Inference If Husband Hides Income  ||  Patna High Court: Cruelty Claims Against In-Laws are Unlikely Without Shared Residence or Interaction  ||  Patna HC: Aadhaar and GPS-Based Attendance For Medical College Faculty Does Not Violate Privacy  ||  Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report  ||  MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC    

SC Asks Centre to Submit Response on Status of Women Army Officers' Permanent Commission - (26 Nov 2020)

DEFENCE

Supreme Court has asked Centre to file a reply in an application contending that the Indian Army has "not granted Permanent Commission to even 50% of women officers", challenging the arbitrary criterion adopted by Centre to "deny benefit to deserving women candidates".

Tags : SUPREME COURT   STATUS OF WOMEN ARMY OFFICERS' PERMANENT COMMISSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved