SC: Hard to Believe Married Woman Was Lured Into Sex by False Marriage Promise; Case Quashed || SC: Properties Acquired by Karta are Presumed to be Joint Hindu Family Assets unless Proven Otherwise || SC: Trial Courts Must Record that Free Legal Aid was Offered to Accused Before Witness Examination || SC: State Government Employees Cannot Claim Dearness Allowance Twice a Year Unless Rules Allow || P&H High Court: Anticipatory Bail on Settlement Can be Revoked if Compromise is Broken || Delhi High Court: Consenting Adults can Choose Life Partners Without Societal or Parental Approval || Cal HC: Excessive Palm Sweating Alone Cannot Render Candidate Medically Unfit for CAPF Appointment || Del HC: Mother's Right to Education and Personal Growth Cannot be Restricted Due To Custody Disputes || SC: Under RTE Act, States Cannot Justify Low Teacher Pay by Citing Centre’s Failure to Release Funds || Supreme Court: While a Child’s Welfare is Paramount, It is Not the Sole Factor in Custody Disputes

Kalyan Chemicals v. Government of A.P. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

Reasonableness of fee depends on facts of case and appreciation of previous fee with passage of time

MANU/SC/0854/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court rejected the claim that collection of a gallonage fee by state at the rate of Re.1 per bulk litre was illegal, arbitrary and without justification in the non-rendering of any service. It added, the state had the authority to impose the fee retrospectively, and in its determination found Re.1 per bulk litre to be reasonable and not excessive.

Relevant : Synthetics and Chemicals Limited v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/0595/1989 Vam Organics Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/1076/1997

Tags : EXCISE FEE EXCESSIVE PASSAGE OF TIME

Share :