Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency || Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children || Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims || Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations || Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary || Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother || Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly || Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay || Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State || Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders

Kalyan Chemicals v. Government of A.P. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

Reasonableness of fee depends on facts of case and appreciation of previous fee with passage of time

MANU/SC/0854/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court rejected the claim that collection of a gallonage fee by state at the rate of Re.1 per bulk litre was illegal, arbitrary and without justification in the non-rendering of any service. It added, the state had the authority to impose the fee retrospectively, and in its determination found Re.1 per bulk litre to be reasonable and not excessive.

Relevant : Synthetics and Chemicals Limited v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/0595/1989 Vam Organics Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/1076/1997

Tags : EXCISE FEE EXCESSIVE PASSAGE OF TIME

Share :