Supreme Court: Promotion Remains Valid Even if an Employee's Grade Pay Stays Unchanged || SC Orders Bihar Government to Remove Ganga Riverbank Encroachments in Patna Within Six Weeks || Bombay HC: Child of Single Mother Can’t be Denied RTE Quota over Deceased Father's Caste Certificate || J&K&L HC: Complaint Dismissed Before Cognisance is Not an Acquittal & is Challengeable U/S 528 BNSS || Delhi HC Acquits Man in 2006 Rape Case, Says Names Like Ram or Mohammad do Not Define Virtue || Gujarat HC: Whatsapp Forward of Fake Newspaper Clipping Not Forgery Absent Proof of Fabrication || Supreme Court tells Parsvnath Developers to Comply with Haryana RERA Orders or Face Jail || Supreme Court: Article 142 Cannot Override a Concluded and Acted-Upon Settlement Between Parties || SC Grants One-Time Relief, Allows Law Students to Take Exams Despite Attendance Shortage || SC Grants One-Time Relief, Allows Law Students to Take Exams Despite Attendance Shortage

Kalyan Chemicals v. Government of A.P. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

Reasonableness of fee depends on facts of case and appreciation of previous fee with passage of time

MANU/SC/0854/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court rejected the claim that collection of a gallonage fee by state at the rate of Re.1 per bulk litre was illegal, arbitrary and without justification in the non-rendering of any service. It added, the state had the authority to impose the fee retrospectively, and in its determination found Re.1 per bulk litre to be reasonable and not excessive.

Relevant : Synthetics and Chemicals Limited v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/0595/1989 Vam Organics Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/1076/1997

Tags : EXCISE FEE EXCESSIVE PASSAGE OF TIME

Share :