SC: Appeal U/S 374 CrPC/415 BNSS is Not Maintainable Against Sessions Court's Reversal of Acquittal  ||  SC Asked the Centre to Promote Awareness About the Consequences of Driving With an Expired Licence  ||  SC Explains How a Deceased Christian Wife's Property Devolves under the Indian Succession Act  ||  Supreme Court: Reach Stacker isn't a Motor Vehicle; MACT Claim Not Maintainable  ||  Supreme Court: Lift Makers, Operators and Owners Share Responsibility for User Safety  ||  Patna HC: Pressure to Sign Divorce and Child Custody does not Amount to Cruelty  ||  Bombay HC: Externment under the Police Act Requires Satisfaction About a Gang's Activities  ||  Bombay HC: False Travel Distance Claim Alone Doesn't Constitute Misappropriation  ||  J&K&L High Court: Interest on Delayed Gratuity is Not a Mandatory Pre-Deposit For an Appeal  ||  Meghalaya HC: Meritorious Candidate Cannot Be Denied Admission For a Two-Minute Delay    

Patna HC: Advocate Intending to Represent Party Without Any Authority Amounts to Soliciting Briefs - (22 Oct 2020)

CIVIL

Patna High Court has cautioned the Advocates that the act of urging the Court to enter their appearance in a case with the intention to represent a party, that too without any authority, amounts to "soliciting briefs" and may invite strict action against the erring Advocate.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   ADVOCATE INTENDING TO REPRESENT PARTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved