Supreme Court: Spouse Cannot Withdraw Consent for Mutual Divorce After Settlement Agreement || Supreme Court Suspends PC Act Sentence of Former Minister Anosh Ekka, Flags Overlapping CBI Cases || Supreme Court: Magistrate’s Probe Order Can’t be Quashed on Accused’s Defence || Delhi High Court: No Adverse Inference if Handwriting Sample Refused Without Section 73 Disclosure || J&K&L HC: Bank Officials Not Entitled to Section 197 CrPC Protection Despite Public Servant Status || Kar HC Orders CBI Probe into 53-Acre Land Acquisition, Citing Alleged Monumental Fraud & Conspiracy || Supreme Court Grants Probation to Convicts; Rules Fine-Only Cases Also Eligible || SC Disposes Plea on Allied Health Course Moratorium After NCAHP Issues 2026–27 Guideline || Supreme Court Grants Promotion Relief to Employee Denied Relaxation, Calling it Discrimination || Patna HC: Tender Lapses if Not Extended on Time & Delay Cannot be Cured by Repeated Representations

Kalyan Chemicals v. Government of A.P. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

Larger amount of fee not excessive given passage of time

MANU/SC/0854/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court rejected the claim that collection of a gallonage fee by state at the rate of Re.1 per bulk litre was illegal, arbitrary and without justification in the non-rendering of any service. It added, the state had the authority to impose the fee retrospectively, and in its determination found Re.1 per bulk litre to be reasonable and not excessive.

Relevant : Synthetics and Chemicals Limited v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/0595/1989 Vam Organics Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/1076/1997

Tags : EXCISE FEE EXCESSIVE PASSAGE OF TIME

Share :