Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof || SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required || Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt || Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment || Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution || Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty || Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act || J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry || Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act || NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another

Kalyan Chemicals v. Government of A.P. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

Larger amount of fee not excessive given passage of time

MANU/SC/0854/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court rejected the claim that collection of a gallonage fee by state at the rate of Re.1 per bulk litre was illegal, arbitrary and without justification in the non-rendering of any service. It added, the state had the authority to impose the fee retrospectively, and in its determination found Re.1 per bulk litre to be reasonable and not excessive.

Relevant : Synthetics and Chemicals Limited v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/0595/1989 Vam Organics Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/1076/1997

Tags : EXCISE FEE EXCESSIVE PASSAGE OF TIME

Share :