Del. HC Stresses Mandatory Legal Assistance to Preserve Fairness and Integrity of Criminal Trials || Supreme Court: Delhi High Court Ruling upheld on Taekwondo National Sports Federation Recognition || SC: Blockchain-Based Digitisation of Land Records Necessary to Reduce Property Document Litigation || Supreme Court to NCLT : Limit Power to Decide Intellectual Property Title Disputes under IBC || Bombay HC: Railway Employee With Valid Privilege Pass is Bona Fide Passenger Despite Missing Entries || Delhi High Court: Mere Pleadings Made To Prosecute or Defend a Case Do Not Amount To Defamation || Delhi High Court: Asking an Accused To Cross-Examine a Witness Without Legal Aid Vitiates The Trial || Delhi High Court: Recruitment Notice Error Creates No Appointment Right Without Vacancy || Supreme Court: Subordinate Legislation Takes Effect Only From its Publication in The Official Gazette || Supreme Court: DDA Must Adopt a Litigation Policy To Screen Cases and Avoid Unnecessary Filings

Kalyan Chemicals v. Government of A.P. and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (12 Aug 2015)

Larger amount of fee not excessive given passage of time

MANU/SC/0854/2015

Excise

The Supreme Court rejected the claim that collection of a gallonage fee by state at the rate of Re.1 per bulk litre was illegal, arbitrary and without justification in the non-rendering of any service. It added, the state had the authority to impose the fee retrospectively, and in its determination found Re.1 per bulk litre to be reasonable and not excessive.

Relevant : Synthetics and Chemicals Limited v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/0595/1989 Vam Organics Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P. MANU/SC/1076/1997

Tags : EXCISE FEE EXCESSIVE PASSAGE OF TIME

Share :