SC: Advocate Must Protect Client Confidentiality Even after Client Turns Adversary  ||  SC: Revenue Record Mutation Alone Cannot Defeat a Person’s Property Title  ||  SC: SARFAESI Auction Valid Despite EMD Shortfall Where 25% Price Was Paid on Auction Day  ||  SC: Extended GST Limitation under S.74 Requires Notice to Specify Fraud or Concealment  ||  Allahabad HC Invalidates Key Provisions of Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Law  ||  Delhi HC: Writ Courts Cannot Prescribe Method for Determining Property Tax  ||  Bombay HC: ICC’s ‘No Sexual Element’ Finding Can Be Challenged under POSH Act  ||  Rajasthan HC: Road Widening Demolition Requires Title Claims and Fair Hearing  ||  Allahabad HC: Mere Presence or FIR Nomination is Insufficient for Conviction under Section 149 IPC  ||  MP HC: Employment Secured Through Forged Records Gives No Right to Hold Public Office    

SC: 'Residence Order' Not for Continuing Civil Proceedings in Relation to Same Subject Matter - (16 Oct 2020)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that the pendency of proceedings under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 or any Residence order interim or final, passed under it, is not an embargo for initiating or continuing any civil proceedings, which relate to the subject matter of such orders/proceedings.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   RESIDENCE ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved