Kerala HC: Persons With Down Syndrome Get Protection and Guardianship under National Trust Act, 1999  ||  J&K&L HC: Contractual Staff Cannot Claim Payment Beyond Contract Period Without Proving Work  ||  J&K&L HC: Revisional Powers U/S 15 Must be Exercised in Reasonable Time, Not After 20-Year Delay  ||  MP High Court: Revoking Building Permission Without Fraud Proof Violates Right to Property  ||  Madras HC: Centre’s Consent For Remission is Needed only When Sentence under Central Act is Ongoing  ||  Delhi HC: Private School Employees Entitled to Child Care Leave Equivalent to Government Employees  ||  Supreme Court Has Released Draft Regulations on AI Use in the Judiciary and Invited Public Feedback  ||  Supreme Court: MMDR Act Royalty Hikes Prevail over Contractual Terms  ||  Delhi HC: Daughter-In-Law Has No Independent Right in Mother-In-Law’s Self-Acquired House  ||  SC: Prolonged Separation Can Constitute Cruelty and Desertion    

SC: NDPS Trial is Not Vitiated Merely Because Ownership of Vehicle Not Established - (11 Sep 2020)

NARCOTICS

Supreme Court has observed that, to prove the case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the ownership of the vehicle from which the contraband is seized is not required to be established.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   OWNERSHIP OF VEHICLE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved