Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

Employees Pension Scheme - (10 Aug 2015)

MANU/PIBU/1038/2015

Service

The Minister of State for Labour and Employment stated the government had constituted an Expert Committee to review Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 which recommended providing minimum pension of Rs. 1000 per month to the pensioners under the 1995 Scheme and enhancing wage ceiling under the Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 from Rs. 6,500/- per month to Rs. 10,000 per month.

Tags : PENSION   EMPLOYEES   PROVIDENT FUND  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved