Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Carries Strong Presumption of Genuineness  ||  SC: Registry Cannot Intrude Into Judiciary’s Exclusive Domain By Questioning Why a Party is Impleaded  ||  Calcutta HC: Third-Party Suits in a Deity’s Name are Allowed Only When The Sebait Loses Authority  ||  Madras HC: Encroachment on a Public Street Cannot be Allowed Even If It Has a Religious Character  ||  Karnataka HC: Bike Taxi Business Protected under Article 19(1)(G); State Can Regulate But Not Ban  ||  Allahabad HC: Not Specifying Arrest Grounds in Memo is Dereliction; Erring Cops Must be Suspended  ||  Del. HC Stresses Mandatory Legal Assistance to Preserve Fairness and Integrity of Criminal Trials  ||  Supreme Court: Delhi High Court Ruling upheld on Taekwondo National Sports Federation Recognition  ||  SC: Blockchain-Based Digitisation of Land Records Necessary to Reduce Property Document Litigation  ||  Supreme Court to NCLT : Limit Power to Decide Intellectual Property Title Disputes under IBC    

Karnataka HC: Physical Presence of Parties is Not Needed for Compromise Petition - (13 Jul 2020)

CIVIL

Karnataka High Court has held that it is perfectly lawful for the Courts to record the compromise on the basis of the compromise Petitions duly signed by the Parties and tendered by their respective Advocates before the Court, even without procuring the personal presence of the parties.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   PRESENCE OF PARTIES   COMPROMISE PETITIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved