NCLAT: Corporate Debtor’s Guarantor Liability Unchanged Despite Internal Adjustments Among Creditors || NCLAT: Plea under IBC Section 7 Can't Be Restored After Corporate Debtor Pays Principal & Interest || Delhi HC: Wife Can Be Denied Maintenance If She Fails To Submit Latest Salary Slips || Kerala HC: Income of Parent Who Abandoned Family Shouldn’t Count For EWS Reservation Eligibility || Gujarat HC: Writ Courts Interfering in Arbitral Procedure Orders Defies A&C Act’s Purpose || Delhi HC: Plaintiff Doesn’t Have Vested Right to File Rejoinder under CPC || J&K&L HC: Name Change Is Fundamental Right; Boards Must Consider Legal Documents, Not Reject Request || SC: Administrative Delays by State Agencies Must Not Be Condoned || Sc: When Sale Deed Is Void, Possession Suit Follows 12-Year Limitation under Article 65, Not Art 59 || SC: Preliminary Inquiry Report Can’t Stop Court from Directing FIR Registration

Avinash Kumar v. Aruna Asaf Ali Government Hospital, GNCTD - (Central Information Commission) (06 Aug 2015)

Concealing name itself protection for whistle-blower

MANU/CI/0198/2015

Right to Information

In a case involving non-response to an application for information by a whistle-blower, the Central Information Commission passed orders for ceasing of harassment of the whistle-blower. In the case, the Appellant's name had been leaked to the accused, which had led to his harassment. The Commission noted that no action had been taken on the revelations by the Appellant, instead he had been relieved of his duties and transferred out of his place of work.

Relevant : Indirect Tax Practitioners Association vs. R.K. Jain MANU/SC/0593/2010

Tags : WHISTLE BLOW RIGHT TO INFORMATION HARASS

Share :