SC: Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Prelims Relaxation Cannot Claim an Unreserved Seat || SC: Public Sector Enterprises Cannot Act Against Retired Employees Without Clear Rules || Supreme Court: Single FIR is Permissible in Mass Cheating Cases Arising From One Conspiracy || SC: Courts Cannot Take Cognizance of Time-Barred Cheque Bounce Cases Without Condoning Delay || SC: Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Always Bar Criminal Prosecution || SC: Judge Cannot Be Presumed Biased Merely Because a Litigant’s Relative Is Police or Court Staff || Delhi HC: Delays From Medical Review Cannot Justify Ante-Dated Seniority For BSF Candidates || Allahabad HC: Being ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Does Not Completely Bar Grant of Anticipatory Bail || Delhi HC: Abortion by a Married Woman For Marital Discord is Legal under The MTP Act || NCLT Kochi: Fraud Has No Time Limit and Directors Cannot Use Delay As a Defense

Avinash Kumar v. Aruna Asaf Ali Government Hospital, GNCTD - (Central Information Commission) (06 Aug 2015)

Concealing name itself protection for whistle-blower

MANU/CI/0198/2015

Right to Information

In a case involving non-response to an application for information by a whistle-blower, the Central Information Commission passed orders for ceasing of harassment of the whistle-blower. In the case, the Appellant's name had been leaked to the accused, which had led to his harassment. The Commission noted that no action had been taken on the revelations by the Appellant, instead he had been relieved of his duties and transferred out of his place of work.

Relevant : Indirect Tax Practitioners Association vs. R.K. Jain MANU/SC/0593/2010

Tags : WHISTLE BLOW RIGHT TO INFORMATION HARASS

Share :