Telang. HC: Passing Preventive Detention Order for Repeated Illegal Sale of Spurious Liquor is Valid  ||  Kerala HC: Police Doesn’t Have Authority to Barge into Homes of History Sheeters at Night  ||  HP HC: Cannot Treat Amount Deposited Under Protest as Admission of Tax Liability  ||  Ker. HC Issues Directions for Notice to Entities Responsible for Polluting Thevara-Perandoor Canal  ||  Gauhati HC Issues Circular Directing Completion of Child Trafficking Cases Within 6 Months  ||  Delhi HC: Online Gaming Platform Winzo Files Suit against Removal of its YouTube Channel  ||  Supreme Court: Court’s Interim Order Only Applicable on Parties in the Suit  ||  SC Deprecates Practice of Parties Getting Bail & Later Going Back on Statements  ||  SC Proposes Laying Down Guidelines for Grant of OBC Certificates to Children of Single Mothers  ||  Mad. HC: Assistant Commissioner Can’t Issue Blanket Prohibitory Order Restraining Entry of Vehicles    

Avinash Kumar v. Aruna Asaf Ali Government Hospital, GNCTD - (Central Information Commission) (06 Aug 2015)

Concealing name itself protection for whistle-blower

MANU/CI/0198/2015

Right to Information

In a case involving non-response to an application for information by a whistle-blower, the Central Information Commission passed orders for ceasing of harassment of the whistle-blower. In the case, the Appellant's name had been leaked to the accused, which had led to his harassment. The Commission noted that no action had been taken on the revelations by the Appellant, instead he had been relieved of his duties and transferred out of his place of work.

Relevant : Indirect Tax Practitioners Association vs. R.K. Jain MANU/SC/0593/2010

Tags : WHISTLE BLOW   RIGHT TO INFORMATION   HARASS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved