Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions || Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award || Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience || Supreme Court: Photographing a Woman not Engaged in Private Acts Does not Constitute Voyeurism || SC Directs UPSC to Permit Scribe Changes Till Seven Days Before Exams and Review Screen-Reader Use || Madras HC: Freedom of Religion Cannot Extend to Disturbing Peace Within Temple Premises || Delhi HC: Lokpal Cannot Form a Prima Facie View on Corruption Without Hearing The Official || MP High Court: DRT Cannot Restrict or Impose Conditions on a Person's Foreign Travel || Bombay HC: Results of Dec 2 And 20 Local Body Election Must be Declared Together || Delhi HC: Employment Disputes Cannot be Treated as Commercial Cases under the Act

Avinash Kumar v. Aruna Asaf Ali Government Hospital, GNCTD - (Central Information Commission) (06 Aug 2015)

Concealing name itself protection for whistle-blower

MANU/CI/0198/2015

Right to Information

In a case involving non-response to an application for information by a whistle-blower, the Central Information Commission passed orders for ceasing of harassment of the whistle-blower. In the case, the Appellant's name had been leaked to the accused, which had led to his harassment. The Commission noted that no action had been taken on the revelations by the Appellant, instead he had been relieved of his duties and transferred out of his place of work.

Relevant : Indirect Tax Practitioners Association vs. R.K. Jain MANU/SC/0593/2010

Tags : WHISTLE BLOW RIGHT TO INFORMATION HARASS

Share :