SC: Hindu Daughter-In-Law Widowed After Her Father-In-Law’s Death is Entitled to Maintenance  ||  SC: Vendor Remains a Necessary Party in Specific Performance Suits Even After Transferring Property  ||  Raj HC: Having Different Age Criteria For Contractual and Regular Appointments is Unconstitutional  ||  Delhi HC: Registered Property Title Prevails over Claims Based on Oral Family Settlements  ||  Gauhati HC: Only A Family Court Can Grant A Divorce under Muslim Law, Not A Civil Judge  ||  Del HC: Courts Cannot Compel Lawyers to Disclose Sources of Documents Filed on Clients' Instructions  ||  SC Explains When Shares Received After Company Amalgamation are Taxable as Business Income  ||  SC: Excavators, Dumpers Etc Used Within Factories aren’t Motor Vehicles For Road Tax Purposes  ||  SC: Complaints Alleging Fraud under Companies Act Can Be Filed Only By SFIO, Not By Private Parties  ||  SC: Preventive Detention Cannot Override Bail and Requires Proof of a Threat to Public Order    

Bombay HC Asks State to File Reply in PIL Seeking Distribution of Seized Sanitizers, Masks - (05 May 2020)

CIVIL

Bombay High Court has directed the State Government to file a reply in a public interest litigation filed by Mohan Joshi seeking distribution of sanitizers, face masks and Personal Protection Equipment kits that were meant for the black market but were seized by the police, amongst doctors, medical staff, police officials and other 'Corona Warriors'.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   SEIZED SANITIZERS   FACE MASKS   PPES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved