Manipur HC: State Establishments Must Record Transgender Person’s New Name & Gender in Documents  ||  Delhi HC: Failure to Frame Counter Claim Despite Pleadings is Patently Illegal  ||  Mumbai Commission Holds Reliance Retail Liable for Defective AC Replacement Failure  ||  SC Orders ASI to Supervise Repair of Mehrauli’s Ancient Dargahs  ||  SC Reprimands Bihar IPS Officer for Affidavit Supporting Murder Convict  ||  SC Rejects Review Plea on WB SSC Jobs, Upholds Quashing of 25k Appointments  ||  SC Rejects Review Plea on WB SSC Jobs, Upholds Quashing of 25k Appointments  ||  Supreme Court Orders Haridwar Collector Inquiry into Maa Chandi Devi Trust  ||  SC Recommends Statutory Appeal Against DJ’s Compensation Orders  ||  SC Dismisses Petition Challenging 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Elections Over Bogus Voting    

Pegasus Assets Reconstruction P. Ltd. v. Haryana Concast Limited and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (29 Dec 2015)

Company Court to not wield power at winding-up under SARFAESI

MANU/SC/1489/2015

Civil

Provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of dues of workmen and their protection are incorporated under the Securitisation Act, 2002 and legal recourse cannot be taken under the former. Dispute arose from the Company Judge imposing conditions on the Appellant, an asset reconstruction company, while passing orders for winding up of a company under the Securitisation Act. The Court confirmed that powers under the Companies Act cannot be used by the Company Judge to interfere with proceedings by a secured creditor realizing its secured interests as per the SARFAESI Act.

Relevant : Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank MANU/SC/0262/2000 Bank of Maharashtra v. Pandurang Keshav Gorwardkar MANU/SC/0500/2013 Arun Kumar Agrawal v. Union of India MANU/SC/1146/2013 Section 13 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Act

Tags : SARFAESI   COMPANIES ACT   CONDITIONS   SECURED ASSET  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved