SC: Delhi HC Can Restrict Senior Advocate Designation to Its Own Retired Judges  ||  Supreme Court: ‘Himachal May Disappear’, Flags Environmental Crisis  ||  Delhi HC: Civil Courts Can Block Foreign Arbitration if it’s Oppressive  ||  Madras HC: No Political Symbols or Leader Photos in Welfare Ads  ||  Bombay HC: Fresh Corruption Trial Allowed After Valid Sanction  ||  Calcutta HC: Compromise Scheme Under Companies Act Overrides SARFAESI  ||  SC: Authority Imposing Minor Penalty Can Initiate Major Penalty Charges  ||  SC Slams HC for 2-Year Bail Delay, Calls for Sensitivity in Liberty Cases  ||  SC: Recalls Judgment in Bhushan Steel Case Citing Injustice Under Art. 142  ||  HP HC: No Detention Merely for Suspected Heroin in Blood    

Pegasus Assets Reconstruction P. Ltd. v. Haryana Concast Limited and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (29 Dec 2015)

Company Court to not wield power at winding-up under SARFAESI

MANU/SC/1489/2015

Civil

Provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of dues of workmen and their protection are incorporated under the Securitisation Act, 2002 and legal recourse cannot be taken under the former. Dispute arose from the Company Judge imposing conditions on the Appellant, an asset reconstruction company, while passing orders for winding up of a company under the Securitisation Act. The Court confirmed that powers under the Companies Act cannot be used by the Company Judge to interfere with proceedings by a secured creditor realizing its secured interests as per the SARFAESI Act.

Relevant : Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank MANU/SC/0262/2000 Bank of Maharashtra v. Pandurang Keshav Gorwardkar MANU/SC/0500/2013 Arun Kumar Agrawal v. Union of India MANU/SC/1146/2013 Section 13 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Act

Tags : SARFAESI   COMPANIES ACT   CONDITIONS   SECURED ASSET  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved