NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Delhi HC: RBI's Intention is to Maintain Status Quo on Account Classification as on March 1 - (15 Apr 2020)

BANKING

Delhi High Court has provided interim relief to an account from being declared a Non Performing Asset by the Punjab & Sind Bank in light of the moratorium allowed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) by its circular issued on 27th March, 2020. The Court has observed that the intention of the RBI while issuing the regulatory package was to maintain status quo with regard to the classification of accounts of the borrower as they existed on 1st March, 2020.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   RESERVE BANK OF INDIA   STATUS QUO ON ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved