SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Deserves Parity With Discharged Co-Accused if Evidence is Not Stronger  ||  SC Allows Euthanasia of Rabid Stray Dogs if Necessary and Protects Officials Acting in Good Faith  ||  Kerala High Court: University Syndicate Cannot Sue Chancellor as Both Form Same Legal Body  ||  Kerala High Court: Unsigned FIS is Admissible if Informant Confirms its Contents in Court  ||  J&K&L High Court: Purchaser’s Structure on Migrant Land Alone Cannot Block Sale Deed Registration  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies    

Delhi HC: RBI's Intention is to Maintain Status Quo on Account Classification as on March 1 - (15 Apr 2020)

BANKING

Delhi High Court has provided interim relief to an account from being declared a Non Performing Asset by the Punjab & Sind Bank in light of the moratorium allowed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) by its circular issued on 27th March, 2020. The Court has observed that the intention of the RBI while issuing the regulatory package was to maintain status quo with regard to the classification of accounts of the borrower as they existed on 1st March, 2020.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   RESERVE BANK OF INDIA   STATUS QUO ON ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved