Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

Delhi HC: RBI's Intention is to Maintain Status Quo on Account Classification as on March 1 - (15 Apr 2020)

BANKING

Delhi High Court has provided interim relief to an account from being declared a Non Performing Asset by the Punjab & Sind Bank in light of the moratorium allowed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) by its circular issued on 27th March, 2020. The Court has observed that the intention of the RBI while issuing the regulatory package was to maintain status quo with regard to the classification of accounts of the borrower as they existed on 1st March, 2020.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   RESERVE BANK OF INDIA   STATUS QUO ON ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved