Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases  ||  SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants  ||  Delhi HC: Minimum Wages During Pending Litigation Cannot be Frozen and Must be Updated Periodically  ||  Kerala HC: ICC Can Probe Sexual Harassment Complaint Against a Director Not Controlling Affairs  ||  Delhi HC: Interim Protection From Blacklisting Does Not Remove Bidder’s Duty to Disclose in Tenders  ||  Allahabad HC: After the BNSS, Pre-Cognizance Hearing of the Accused is Mandatory in NDPS Complaints  ||  Delhi HC: Husband Cannot Avoid Maintenance For Wife and Children by Claiming Irregular Income  ||  SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law    

Delhi HC: RBI's Intention is to Maintain Status Quo on Account Classification as on March 1 - (15 Apr 2020)

BANKING

Delhi High Court has provided interim relief to an account from being declared a Non Performing Asset by the Punjab & Sind Bank in light of the moratorium allowed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) by its circular issued on 27th March, 2020. The Court has observed that the intention of the RBI while issuing the regulatory package was to maintain status quo with regard to the classification of accounts of the borrower as they existed on 1st March, 2020.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   RESERVE BANK OF INDIA   STATUS QUO ON ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved