All HC: No Bar on Anticipa. Bail to Accused Booked u/s 376(3) IPC through UP Amend. to S. 438 CrPC  ||  NCDRC Cautioned by Supreme Court: Hierarchy of Judiciary Must Be Respected  ||  Supreme Court: Cannot Allow Wrong Doers to Make Profit Out of Their Own Wrongs  ||  AP HC: App. u/s 11(6) Can Only be Maintained if Parties Fail to Refer Dispute to Arbi. Even After Not  ||  Del. HC: Father Held Guilty of Repeatedly Raping Minor Daughter for 2 Years, Acquittal Reversed  ||  SC: Reconsideration Required of the Judgement That Brought Doctors Under Consumer Protection Act  ||  SC: Person Purchasing Prop. Knowing About Appeal Pendency Can’t Claim Restit. as Bona Fide Purchaser  ||  SC: Authorities Directed to Take Immediate Measures Regarding Municipal Solid Waste in Delhi  ||  Del. HC: In-Mall Marketing Campaigns Also Advertisements, HUL Restrained from Comparing Products  ||  Andhra Pradesh HC: Cannot Cancel Selection Process in Absence of Valid, Bonafide Reasons    

Punjab & Haryana HC: Mere 'Apprehension' of Malpractice Not Sufficient to Investigate University - (04 Mar 2020)

EDUCATION

Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a Petition filed by a student levelling allegations of malpractice in the evaluation of examination by Kurukshetra University. The Court further clarified that mere "apprehension" of malpractice was not sufficient and that cogent material was necessary to seek judicial interference.

Tags : PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT   'APPREHENSION' OF MALPRACTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved