NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings  ||  Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same  ||  Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted  ||  Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers  ||  SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority  ||  SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays  ||  SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal  ||  SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches    

Madras HC to Suo Motu Test Constitutional Validity of Section 36B of Advocates Act, 1961 - (02 Mar 2020)

CONSTITUTION

Madras High Court has decided to suo moto consider the validity of Section 36B of the Advocates Act, 1961, in as much as it stipulates that in case a Disciplinary inquiry against an Advocate is not completed by the State Bar Council within stipulated time, the same shall stand transferred to the Bar Council of India.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF SECTION 36B OF THE ADVOCATES ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved