NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings || Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint || Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same || Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted || Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers || SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority || SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays || SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab || SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal || SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Which Misread Direction - (02 Mar 2020)

CRIMINAL

Delhi High Court has clarified that there is a difference between "addition" of charge and "alteration" of charge under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court has stated that when the High Court had, in a criminal revision Petition, directed the Trial Court to add the charge under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against the Accused, the Trial Court had erred since it "replaced" the existing charge under Section 304 Part I with Section 304B of IPC.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT TRIAL COURT ORDER WHICH MISREAD DIRECTION

Share :