NCLAT: Cannot Withhold Income Tax Refund Received by Bank During CIRP In CD's Account || All. HC: With S. 111 of BNS Covering 'Organised Crime' It Appears Gangsters Act has become Redundant || P&H HC: Cannot Allow Changes in Admission Form after Submission || Bom. HC: Findings in Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Relied Upon While Adjudicating Civil Proceedings || P&H HC Directs Jail Authorities to Decide Parole Applications within Four Months || Allahabad HC: Merely Supporting Pakistan Will Not Prima Facie Attract Section 152 of BNS || HP HC Upholds Wife’s Claim of Adverse Possession after Husband’s Death || Patna HC: Maintenance may be Allowed in Disputed Marriages if Relationship Was Socially Accepted || Karnataka HC: State to Respond in 3 Weeks regarding Mandatory Teaching of Kannada || Delhi HC: Husband Unhappy in Marriage is No Proof of Abetment of Suicide

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Which Misread Direction - (02 Mar 2020)

CRIMINAL

Delhi High Court has clarified that there is a difference between "addition" of charge and "alteration" of charge under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court has stated that when the High Court had, in a criminal revision Petition, directed the Trial Court to add the charge under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against the Accused, the Trial Court had erred since it "replaced" the existing charge under Section 304 Part I with Section 304B of IPC.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT TRIAL COURT ORDER WHICH MISREAD DIRECTION

Share :