Calcutta HC: Employee Looking for Another Job with Rival Company Isn’t Contrary || Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered || Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered || Allahabad HC: No Power on Police to Open History-Sheet on Likes or Dislikes || Rajasthan HC Puts Stay on Installation of Dairy Booth Outside Private Residence || Calcutta HC: Cannot Summon Accused to Produce Incriminating Evidence against Himself || Kerala HC Upholds STA’s decision mandating installation of cameras with Fatigue Detection Censors || SC: Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Processes || Delhi Lieutenant Governor’s Notification regarding Evidence of Police officers Put on Hold || SC Issues Notice in Plea to Bring Bar Councils under POSH Act

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Which Misread Direction - (02 Mar 2020)

CRIMINAL

Delhi High Court has clarified that there is a difference between "addition" of charge and "alteration" of charge under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court has stated that when the High Court had, in a criminal revision Petition, directed the Trial Court to add the charge under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against the Accused, the Trial Court had erred since it "replaced" the existing charge under Section 304 Part I with Section 304B of IPC.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT TRIAL COURT ORDER WHICH MISREAD DIRECTION

Share :