Del. HC Stresses Mandatory Legal Assistance to Preserve Fairness and Integrity of Criminal Trials  ||  Supreme Court: Delhi High Court Ruling upheld on Taekwondo National Sports Federation Recognition  ||  SC: Blockchain-Based Digitisation of Land Records Necessary to Reduce Property Document Litigation  ||  Supreme Court to NCLT : Limit Power to Decide Intellectual Property Title Disputes under IBC  ||  Bombay HC: Railway Employee With Valid Privilege Pass is Bona Fide Passenger Despite Missing Entries  ||  Delhi High Court: Mere Pleadings Made To Prosecute or Defend a Case Do Not Amount To Defamation  ||  Delhi High Court: Asking an Accused To Cross-Examine a Witness Without Legal Aid Vitiates The Trial  ||  Delhi High Court: Recruitment Notice Error Creates No Appointment Right Without Vacancy  ||  Supreme Court: Subordinate Legislation Takes Effect Only From its Publication in The Official Gazette  ||  Supreme Court: DDA Must Adopt a Litigation Policy To Screen Cases and Avoid Unnecessary Filings    

Madras HC: Interim Custody of Seized Property Does Not Confer Ownership - (07 Jan 2016)

Madras HC has held that cash and valuables recovered by police while investigation need not be handed over to their owners pending trial since criminal courts only decide on granting interim custody to person who have better claim and it is up to civil courts to decide on lawful ownership after it.

Tags : MADRAS HC   CASH AND VALUABLES   INVESTIGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved