NCLAT: Section 43(1) of IBC applicable when Corporate Debtor has given a preference in transaction  ||  AP HC Declines Stay on Govt. Memo Permitting Higher Rate for Premiere of Pushpa 2 Movie  ||  SC: Amended Regulations Not Bind State University Affiliated Institutions without State Adoption  ||  MP High Court Issues Guidelines for Safe Travel of School Children  ||  Cal. HC: Bail Cannot be Denied on Account of Restrictive Statutory Provisions in Penal Statute  ||  SC: Police Verification Report of Selected Candidates Must be filed within 6 Months of Appointment  ||  SC: Intent of S.50 is to Inform Suspect of Option to be Taken to Officer Other Than Search Party  ||  SC: Amended Regulations Not Bind State University Affiliated Institutions without State Adoption  ||  Rajya Sabha Passes the ‘Bharatiya Vayuyan Vidheyak, 2024’  ||  Del. HC: It’s a Disturbing Trend of Exploiting Social Media Platforms for Committing Sexual Offences    

Madras HC: Interim Custody of Seized Property Does Not Confer Ownership - (07 Jan 2016)

Madras HC has held that cash and valuables recovered by police while investigation need not be handed over to their owners pending trial since criminal courts only decide on granting interim custody to person who have better claim and it is up to civil courts to decide on lawful ownership after it.

Tags : MADRAS HC   CASH AND VALUABLES   INVESTIGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved