SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Deserves Parity With Discharged Co-Accused if Evidence is Not Stronger  ||  SC Allows Euthanasia of Rabid Stray Dogs if Necessary and Protects Officials Acting in Good Faith  ||  Kerala High Court: University Syndicate Cannot Sue Chancellor as Both Form Same Legal Body  ||  Kerala High Court: Unsigned FIS is Admissible if Informant Confirms its Contents in Court  ||  J&K&L High Court: Purchaser’s Structure on Migrant Land Alone Cannot Block Sale Deed Registration  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies    

NCLAT Hauls Unitech Ltd for Defaulting Payment to Deposit Holders - (28 Feb 2020)

COMPANY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has directed Unitech Limited to repay the amount(s) to its deposit holder’s penedente lite along with future interest @ 12.5% per annum from the date of maturity of the respective Fixed Deposit Receipts. The Tribunal has also imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000/- to each of the deposit holders, setting aside the order of National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   UNITECH LTD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved