Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC  ||  Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case  ||  Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life  ||  Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act    

NCLAT Hauls Unitech Ltd for Defaulting Payment to Deposit Holders - (28 Feb 2020)

COMPANY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has directed Unitech Limited to repay the amount(s) to its deposit holder’s penedente lite along with future interest @ 12.5% per annum from the date of maturity of the respective Fixed Deposit Receipts. The Tribunal has also imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000/- to each of the deposit holders, setting aside the order of National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   UNITECH LTD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved