SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved  ||  Calcutta HC: Conviction under Essential Commodities Act Invalid if Stock Measured With a 'Stick'  ||  Kerala High Court: Universities Must Regulate Student Political Activities to Curb Campus Violence  ||  Calcutta HC: Accused Has No Right on Investigation Mode or Impleadment in Probe Writ  ||  Gauhati HC: POCSO Probes Must be Child-Friendly, With Sensitized Investigators to Ensure Clear Truth  ||  Kerala HC: Orders Barring Disclosure of Witness Statements Must State Reasons For Each Witness  ||  SC: Hard to Believe Married Woman Was Lured Into Sex by False Marriage Promise; Case Quashed    

NCLAT Hauls Unitech Ltd for Defaulting Payment to Deposit Holders - (28 Feb 2020)

COMPANY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has directed Unitech Limited to repay the amount(s) to its deposit holder’s penedente lite along with future interest @ 12.5% per annum from the date of maturity of the respective Fixed Deposit Receipts. The Tribunal has also imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000/- to each of the deposit holders, setting aside the order of National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   UNITECH LTD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved