Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

NCLAT Hauls Unitech Ltd for Defaulting Payment to Deposit Holders - (28 Feb 2020)

COMPANY

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has directed Unitech Limited to repay the amount(s) to its deposit holder’s penedente lite along with future interest @ 12.5% per annum from the date of maturity of the respective Fixed Deposit Receipts. The Tribunal has also imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000/- to each of the deposit holders, setting aside the order of National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi.

Tags : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   UNITECH LTD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved