Supreme Court: State Must Be Impleaded When Relief is Sought From Public Exchequer  ||  SC: Student Fees Cannot Be Increased Mid-Course Except in Exceptional Circumstances  ||  Supreme Court: ED's Delay in Sending Arrest Order Does Not By Itself Invalidate Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Appeal Limitation Runs From NCLAT Order Pronouncement, Not Certified Copy Receipt  ||  Gujarat High Court: Waqf Tribunal Has No Supervisory Authority Over Waqf Board  ||  Kerala High Court Orders Aadhaar Fingerprint Comparison to Trace Sreekrishnapuram Murder Culprits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unnatural Death at Police Station Alone Cannot Establish Police Negligence  ||  Orissa High Court: Teacher Scolding Student for Intoxicant Use is Not Suicide Abetment  ||  Supreme Court: Drug Users are Victims and Focus Must Be on Breaking the Supply Chain  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatories May Join Arbitration When the Dispute Affects Their Rights    

Madhya Pradesh HC: Mere Statements Cannot be Considered as Incriminating Material - (24 Feb 2020)

DIRECT TAXATION

Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the unexplained investments were made by the Assessing Officer merely based on the statements given during the survey and that there is no incriminating material or documentary evidence available with the Assessing Officer to substantiate the said additions for the assessment year.

Tags : MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT   INCRIMINATING MATERIAL OR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved