SC: CIRP Need Not Be Set Aside Solely for Fraudulent Filing of Section 9 Plea  ||  Supreme Court: Compromise Decree Passed Without Impleading Necessary Party is Void  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Notice Valid if Sent to Drawer’s Address and Received by Family  ||  J&K&L HC: Minority During Attestation Cannot Justify Decades-Long Delay in Challenging Mutation  ||  Bombay HC: WhatsApp Circulation of Objectionable Photos Can Attract SC/ST Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Cardiac Arrest From Stress of Long-Distance Driving is Compensable  ||  Delhi HC: Accused Cannot Delay Trial and Then Rely on Delay to Seek Bail  ||  Calcutta HC: Insurer Must Compensate Child’s Accidental Death Despite Driver’s Fake Licence  ||  Bombay HC Tells X to Take Down Defamatory Post Targeting Serum Institute, CEO Adar Poonawalla  ||  Delhi High Court Restores Arbitral Award in DMRC’s Favour Passed by Employee-Arbitrator    

Madhya Pradesh HC: Mere Statements Cannot be Considered as Incriminating Material - (24 Feb 2020)

DIRECT TAXATION

Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the unexplained investments were made by the Assessing Officer merely based on the statements given during the survey and that there is no incriminating material or documentary evidence available with the Assessing Officer to substantiate the said additions for the assessment year.

Tags : MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT   INCRIMINATING MATERIAL OR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved