SC: Ex-Contract Workers Must Be Preferred When Employers Replace Contract Labour With Regular Staff  ||  SC: Waqf Tribunals Cannot Hear Claims over Properties Not Listed or Registered under Waqf Act  ||  Supreme Court: Stray Dog Attacks on Beaches Adversely Impact Tourism  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Court Employees Cannot Enroll as Regular LLB Students in Breach of Service Rules  ||  Kerala HC: Telling Someone to "Go Away And Die" in Anger Does Not Amount to Abetment of Suicide  ||  Kerala HC: High Courts Work On Holidays; Denying Compensatory Leave To Officers Violates Art. 229  ||  Del HC: Probationers are ‘Workmen’ under ID Act; S.17B Wages not Recoverable if Termination Upheld  ||  Supreme Court: Confession Without Corroboration Cannot Form the Basis of Conviction  ||  SC: Higher Land Acquisition Compensation to Some Owners Cannot Invalidate Awards to Others  ||  SC: Prior Written Demand is Not Mandatory For an Industrial Dispute to Exist or be Referred    

CESTAT, Mumbai Upholds Excise Duty Demand Against Cadbury - (17 Feb 2020)

EXCISE

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai has held that ‘milk crumb’ is marketable and hence Cadbury is liable to pay excise duty.

Tags : CUSTOMS EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   CADBURY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved