Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration  ||  SC: No Quota Applies For Judicial Officers in District Judge Posts, Issuing Seniority Guidelines  ||  SC: Interest Rate Disputes Doesn't Fall under Public Policy to Set Aside Arbitration Awards  ||  SC: If Some Offences are Quashed By Compromise, the FIR For The Same Incident Cannot Continue  ||  Supreme Court: TIP is Unreliable if the Witness Saw the Accused Beforehand  ||  Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices  ||  AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation  ||  SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement    

CESTAT, Mumbai Upholds Excise Duty Demand Against Cadbury - (17 Feb 2020)

EXCISE

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai has held that ‘milk crumb’ is marketable and hence Cadbury is liable to pay excise duty.

Tags : CUSTOMS EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL   CADBURY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved