Calcutta HC: Employee Looking for Another Job with Rival Company Isn’t Contrary  ||  Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered  ||  Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered  ||  Allahabad HC: No Power on Police to Open History-Sheet on Likes or Dislikes  ||  Rajasthan HC Puts Stay on Installation of Dairy Booth Outside Private Residence  ||  Calcutta HC: Cannot Summon Accused to Produce Incriminating Evidence against Himself  ||  Kerala HC Upholds STA’s decision mandating installation of cameras with Fatigue Detection Censors  ||  SC: Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Processes  ||  Delhi Lieutenant Governor’s Notification regarding Evidence of Police officers Put on Hold  ||  SC Issues Notice in Plea to Bring Bar Councils under POSH Act    

SC: Minimal Interference by Courts in Terms of Section 48 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - (14 Feb 2020)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has held that while considering grounds for setting aside a foreign award, Court must warrant minimal interference. The Court has emphasized that section 48 (1) (b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be given an expansive meaning.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INTERFERENCE BY COURTS   ARBITRATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved