Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions  ||  Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award  ||  Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience  ||  Supreme Court: Photographing a Woman not Engaged in Private Acts Does not Constitute Voyeurism  ||  SC Directs UPSC to Permit Scribe Changes Till Seven Days Before Exams and Review Screen-Reader Use  ||  Madras HC: Freedom of Religion Cannot Extend to Disturbing Peace Within Temple Premises  ||  Delhi HC: Lokpal Cannot Form a Prima Facie View on Corruption Without Hearing The Official  ||  MP High Court: DRT Cannot Restrict or Impose Conditions on a Person's Foreign Travel  ||  Bombay HC: Results of Dec 2 And 20 Local Body Election Must be Declared Together  ||  Delhi HC: Employment Disputes Cannot be Treated as Commercial Cases under the Act    

SC: Minimal Interference by Courts in Terms of Section 48 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - (14 Feb 2020)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has held that while considering grounds for setting aside a foreign award, Court must warrant minimal interference. The Court has emphasized that section 48 (1) (b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be given an expansive meaning.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INTERFERENCE BY COURTS   ARBITRATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved