Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration  ||  SC: No Quota Applies For Judicial Officers in District Judge Posts, Issuing Seniority Guidelines  ||  SC: Interest Rate Disputes Doesn't Fall under Public Policy to Set Aside Arbitration Awards  ||  SC: If Some Offences are Quashed By Compromise, the FIR For The Same Incident Cannot Continue  ||  Supreme Court: TIP is Unreliable if the Witness Saw the Accused Beforehand  ||  Delhi HC: MYAS Not Bound to ‘Rubber-Stamp’ International Federation Choices  ||  AP HC: Fulfilling Rehabilitation Promises to Displaced is State’s Constitutional Obligation  ||  SC: Career Progression to Higher Echelons of Judiciary is Neither a Matter of Right Nor Entitlement    

SC: Minimal Interference by Courts in Terms of Section 48 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - (14 Feb 2020)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has held that while considering grounds for setting aside a foreign award, Court must warrant minimal interference. The Court has emphasized that section 48 (1) (b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be given an expansive meaning.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INTERFERENCE BY COURTS   ARBITRATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved