NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Supreme Court: No Presumption That Decision Taken by Persons Occupying High Posts is Valid - (12 Feb 2020)

DEFENCE

Supreme Court has observed that there is no presumption that a decision taken by persons occupying High posts is valid and that all power vested in the authorities has to be discharged in accordance with the principles laid down by the Constitution of India, 1949 and the other Statutes or Rules/Regulations governing the field.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DECISION TAKEN BY PERSONS OCCUPYING HIGH POSTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved