SC: Bribe Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt without Proof of Demand under PC Act || SC: Cut Power, Water to Bulk Waste Generators Violating Solid Waste Rules || SC: RPF Employee Who Conceals Criminal Case Can be Discharged at Any Stage || SC: Police can Register FIR Despite Magistrate Rejecting S.156(3) CrPC Application || SC: Criminal Acquittal Alone Cannot Prove Absence of Negligence in Accident Claims || SC: Referral Fees Earned By Auto Dealers for Bank, Insurance Promotion Taxable as Service Tax || Supreme Court Revisits the definition of “Industry”: 9-Judge Bench Reformulates the 1978 Triple Test || Delhi HC: Exam Integrity is a Shared Duty of Candidates and Authorities || Delhi High Court: POCSO Allows Child Witness Cross-Examination but Bars Aggressive Questioning || Kerala HC: Christian Women May File Divorce Pleas Where They Reside

SC: Accused Released on Anticipatory Bail Need Not Surrender and Seek Regular Bail for Recovery - (31 Jan 2020)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that "limited custody" or "deemed custody" to facilitate the requirements of the investigative authority, would be sufficient for the purpose of fulfilling the provisions of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, in the event of recovery of an article, or discovery of a fact, which is relatable to a statement made during such recovery or during deemed custody. In such an event, there is no necessity to ask the accused to separately surrender and seek regular bail.

Tags : SUPREME COURT RECOVERY

Share :