Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Bombay HC: Even if Remand Order is Illegal, Still Writ of Habeas Corpus Not Effective Remedy - (27 Jan 2020)

CIVIL

Bombay High Court has dismissed a Writ of Habeas Corpus observing that even if the Magistrate had acted rather mechanically remanding the accused in judicial custody and took the process in a cavalier fashion showing insensitivity towards the denial of personal liberty of a citizen, the Writ of Habeas Corpus would not be maintainable where there is order of remand, in which case the remedy would lie elsewhere.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS   ILLEGAL REMAND ORDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved