Bombay HC: Wife Humiliating Husband in Front of His Friends is Amounts to Cruelty || Delhi HC Interprets Doctrine of “Compelled Self-Publication”, || Del. HC Issues Summons to Campus Sutra in Trademark Infringement Suit Filed by Footwear Brand Campus || Bombay HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Restraining Order against PRADA || Delhi HC: Cannot Bypass Bar on Revision of Interlocutory Order by Invoking Inherent Jurisdiction || Delhi HC: Prosecutrix’s Refusal to Undergo Medical Examination Weakens the Case || Bom. HC: No Provision under JJ Act that Allows Adoption of a Child of Foreign Citizenship || SC Passes Order to Prevent Russian Mother’s Attempt to Flee with Child || SC: Deprivation of Natural Heir from Will May Not Raise Suspicion || SC: Denying Female Heir Right in Property Only Exacerbates Gender Division

Allahabad High Court: Section 164(2) of Companies Act is Constitutionally Valid - (21 Jan 2020)

COMPANY

Allahabad High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, which stipulates that a Director whose company has not filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three financial years, shall be disqualified from holding the position for five years. The Court has also held that the "financial year" for the Section would start only from 2014-15.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY SECTION 164 (2) COMPANIES ACT 2013

Share :