Lok Sabha Confirms Imposition of President Rule in Manipur  ||  AP HC: Court Possesses Limited Scope of Judicial Review in Transfer Cases on Account of Exigencies  ||  Bom. HC: Can’t Evict Tenants Under Arbitration Act if Occupying Premises Falling under DA  ||  Delhi High Court Passes Permanent Injunction in Favour of ‘Peak XV Partners’  ||  Bombay HC: Condition that Younger Candidate Would be Preferred Over Older Candidate Violates COI  ||  Kar. HC Refuses to Entertain Petition Seeking Implementation of Circular Regarding Usage of ‘Dalit’  ||  Kar. HC: Rapido, Uber Can’t Operate in State Unless Relevant Guidelines Issued  ||  Delhi HC: Preserve CCTV Footage When Complaint against Dept. Regarding Illegal Detention in Received  ||  SC Refuses to Direct States to Establish Public Libraries  ||  SC: To Prevent Re-Litigation, Quasi-Judicial Bodies are Bound by Principles of Res-Judicata    

Meru Travel Solutions Private Limited and Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. - (Competition Commission of India) (22 Dec 2015)

CCI dismisses Meru’s ‘dominant position’ complaint against Uber

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Commission of India rejected Meru Travel Solutions’ (owner of Meru Cabs) complaint against Uber for holding a dominant position in the radio taxi market in Kolkata. The Commission determined that Uber did not have a dominant position in the relevant market, which included radio-taxi’s and local yellow taxis, and rejected market reports adduced on behalf of Meru claiming Uber’s majority share for lacking veracity. In its complaint Meru had alleged Uber to have undertaken predatory strategies that excluded companies from the radio-taxi market, allowing it to operate independent of competition. Meru’s allegations were predicated on Uber’s “unabated predatory pricing” and business model which forewent profits in favour of poaching drivers from other operators.

Tags : RADIO TAXI   DOMINANT POSITION   KOLKATA   MERU   UBER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved