Delhi HC Rejects Plea Against BCCI Team Named 'Team India', Terms it a Sheer Waste of Time  ||  Bombay HC: No Absolute Right for Citizens to Access Public Offices  ||  Delhi HC: Suit Withdrawal After Compromise Doesn’t Result in Executable Decree  ||  Delhi HC: ITSC Abolition Doesn’t Void Settlement Pleas Filed Between Feb 1–Mar 31, 2021  ||  Rajasthan HC: State Must Set Up Trauma Centre, Art Institute; Temple Board Can Only Assist  ||  Kerala HC: LIC Cancer Cover Starts From First Diagnosis After Waiting Period, Not Expert Opinion  ||  Kerala HC: Spouse’s Ill Treatment of Children is Cruelty under Section 10(1) Divorce Act  ||  Supreme Court Acquits Chennai Man Sentenced to Death in Child Rape-Murder Case  ||  SC: Only Disclosure Leading to Weapon Recovery Admissible under Section 27 Evidence Act  ||  Supreme Court Orders Strict Enforcement on Helmets, Lane Discipline & Headlight Use    

Meru Travel Solutions Private Limited and Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. - (Competition Commission of India) (22 Dec 2015)

CCI dismisses Meru’s ‘dominant position’ complaint against Uber

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Commission of India rejected Meru Travel Solutions’ (owner of Meru Cabs) complaint against Uber for holding a dominant position in the radio taxi market in Kolkata. The Commission determined that Uber did not have a dominant position in the relevant market, which included radio-taxi’s and local yellow taxis, and rejected market reports adduced on behalf of Meru claiming Uber’s majority share for lacking veracity. In its complaint Meru had alleged Uber to have undertaken predatory strategies that excluded companies from the radio-taxi market, allowing it to operate independent of competition. Meru’s allegations were predicated on Uber’s “unabated predatory pricing” and business model which forewent profits in favour of poaching drivers from other operators.

Tags : RADIO TAXI   DOMINANT POSITION   KOLKATA   MERU   UBER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved