Manipur HC: State Establishments Must Record Transgender Person’s New Name & Gender in Documents  ||  Delhi HC: Failure to Frame Counter Claim Despite Pleadings is Patently Illegal  ||  Mumbai Commission Holds Reliance Retail Liable for Defective AC Replacement Failure  ||  SC Orders ASI to Supervise Repair of Mehrauli’s Ancient Dargahs  ||  SC Reprimands Bihar IPS Officer for Affidavit Supporting Murder Convict  ||  SC Rejects Review Plea on WB SSC Jobs, Upholds Quashing of 25k Appointments  ||  SC Rejects Review Plea on WB SSC Jobs, Upholds Quashing of 25k Appointments  ||  Supreme Court Orders Haridwar Collector Inquiry into Maa Chandi Devi Trust  ||  SC Recommends Statutory Appeal Against DJ’s Compensation Orders  ||  SC Dismisses Petition Challenging 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Elections Over Bogus Voting    

Meru Travel Solutions Private Limited and Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. - (Competition Commission of India) (22 Dec 2015)

CCI dismisses Meru’s ‘dominant position’ complaint against Uber

MRTP/ Competition Laws

The Competition Commission of India rejected Meru Travel Solutions’ (owner of Meru Cabs) complaint against Uber for holding a dominant position in the radio taxi market in Kolkata. The Commission determined that Uber did not have a dominant position in the relevant market, which included radio-taxi’s and local yellow taxis, and rejected market reports adduced on behalf of Meru claiming Uber’s majority share for lacking veracity. In its complaint Meru had alleged Uber to have undertaken predatory strategies that excluded companies from the radio-taxi market, allowing it to operate independent of competition. Meru’s allegations were predicated on Uber’s “unabated predatory pricing” and business model which forewent profits in favour of poaching drivers from other operators.

Tags : RADIO TAXI   DOMINANT POSITION   KOLKATA   MERU   UBER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved